onuelver >> petak januar 19 - 04:31

And so i killed Maestro....he disappeared shortly after my last post here.

Numpty >> petak januar 19 - 09:18

You're an assassin @onuelver. :D

Kupus >> petak januar 19 - 13:25

A side note, I actually believe it was a she. Not a he. 

Numpty >> petak januar 19 - 14:24

Oh dear, so she's been 'mispronouned'. 

That's an even worse crime . Apparently. :D

Numpty >> subota januar 20 - 11:21

My Construction Master retired and I immediately replaced him with the best available unassigned staff who had skill level 6. 

The next day I bought a replacement to fill the quota for unassigned staff. His best skill was Construction Master level 7. Ouch!

Stephen >> subota januar 20 - 12:05

Man, that's annoying!

Ar4ers >> nedjelja januar 21 - 23:52

How admins accepted this?

https://rockingsoccer.com/en/soccer/info/player-2500485/employment

Numpty >> ponedjeljak januar 22 - 00:26

Yes, it's a massive transfer fee, but the player is world class and still improving. 

What's the issue exactly?

Ar4ers >> ponedjeljak januar 22 - 08:34

It depends how much bidders there was

Numpty >> ponedjeljak januar 22 - 11:55

Yes, other bidders help to 'legitimise' the amount to some degree, But whether there were other bidders or not is not proof that the transfer fee is either excessive or reasonable. 

I'm not admin, but if I were I would ask myself 2 main questions. 

Is the transfer fee within the normal range for 'fair value' and is this an unusual purchase and/or amount for the buying manager? 

When it comes to deciding on 'fair value' the best guide is what other similar players are selling for. This is much more difficult when it comes to valuing the very best players in the game.

This one was a fairly young supertalent at birth and trained for most of his career in an FA6 with 2 staff, which goes some way to explain his massive stats. He's only 26, yet to reach his peak and loyal, so how do you put a fair value on that? Other world class players have sold for similar amounts. I wouldn't want to pay that myself, but it's probably not excessive especially if the buying manager has a track record.  

And when I looked at the buyer that's exactly what I see. North American Champions League finalist for each of the last 5 seasons: 73, 74, 75, 76, 77. 

If it was a one off massive purchase I would have more concerns but the buyer has a track record and knows what he's doing.  

Ebitimi >> ponedjeljak januar 22 - 13:16

Lol....  That's all I have to say. Because if I say all that's on my mind I might likely get suspended. So LOL 

Numpty >> utorak januar 23 - 00:56

This transfer window is awful - seriously fed up after winning about 1 bid in 20!

Ebitimi >> utorak januar 23 - 05:20

Lol, at least you've won something. I'm yet to and not for lack of trying.

Cloughie >> utorak januar 23 - 23:04

For the first time I'm thinking of giving of alcohol!!! For some unknown reason I put my new singing and best player up for sale and yesterday ... a day after working hard to find the perfect addition

Ebitimi >> srijeda januar 24 - 16:19

Lol, Cloughie I saw what you did there. That's very funny Like was that a mistake or something?   Majority of the profit would be taken by the bank since you bought him and sold him in same window.