Numpty >>
pátek březen 26 - 11:45, Editováno
pátek březen 26 - 11:57 That's a really good question.
A midfielder will use his passing for the penalty but a forward will get a whole ball extra. This means that a midfielder with PS will be about as likely to score as a forward without it.
It's probably not a bad idea because of the 0.5 scoring penalty.
The chance of the midfielder missing the penalty compared to the cost of the 0.5 scoring penalty given to a forward who scores will depend very much on the quality of the opponent.
If it's a very tough opponent and the forward may not score anyway it makes more sense to settle for him scoring a penalty. Take the goal while you can. If it's a fairly easy opponent and you hope to score a few goals then letting the midfielder take the pens increases your chance of winning by a bigger margin.
The point of considering these 2 scenarios is that the midfielder taking the pens is only a big advantage in the matches that you are likely to win anyway. The closer tougher matches where you might not score at all then it's better to have the forward taking them and make sure you score at least one.
There may also be better alternatives such as having a forward with both PS and Sharpshooter, or replacing the forward after he scores.
Edit
Just to add that so far I've played most of my matches in the bottom level against very weak bot teams and won most by a large margin. I often used 1 senior forward for the whole match and then used weaker youth forwards giving them a half each. I always gave the penalty duties to any youth forward who was going off at half time.