George LGeorge >> torsdag marts 26 - 10:05

There's a team in my league that seems to be selling all assets and replacing them with crap. I assume the  the manager  will leave soon. ls this allowable VB ?

Losing >> torsdag marts 26 - 10:36

You mean Thunder Bay? I'm guessing they're selling players with enough value in order to build facilities.

Numpty >> torsdag marts 26 - 10:41

Yeah, me too. The sales seem to make sense. 

He's also a fairly new manager so can't be expected to make the best choices when buying replacements. 

George LGeorge >> torsdag marts 26 - 16:38

Ok thanks I wasn't sure about these circumstances

Lumpen >> torsdag april 30 - 13:02

he ended up screwing the team xD

onuelver >> fredag maj 1 - 07:30

There are also several long-time jumpers who take a decent team then sell all best players and buy in complete crap that will decay after 1-2 seasons and then select new victim. After that team will be relegated to bottom league and nobody want it. One of such managers is Zornig(or whatever name he currently has)- i have seen many teams after his short period starting quick fall. Maybe there should be rule that such manager who destroyed a team can't take over any advanced teams next 12 months? In real life none of decent clubs would hire manager whose career is full of downfalls with most of clubs and has such reputation.

Kalle >> fredag maj 1 - 09:21

On the other side of that medal, it does create room for players who started later to chatch up :)

Let jumper destroy clubs, there is so much more pride and join in building a team and promoting to the top than just take a big club that's been dumped by its previous manager and having instant succes.

Personly for me, i would like to see that managers couldn't switch sides midseason and that managerless teams where auto demoted to the lowest region between seasons.

Numpty >> fredag maj 1 - 09:46

100% agree with Kalle.