@Keswick thanks for answering !
"Those countries that fit the bill don't have the infrastructure, money and political will to hold a World Cup."
Obviously, a lot of hard core dictatorships, some of them being particularly aggressive, with a lot of power, money and infrastructures have hosted big competitions in the past, both OG and WC.
The reason why dictatorships of the worst type often get a good chance at organizing the WC is simply that FIFA itself is corrupt to the core.
And here are a few reasons why big competitions are highly sought after by dictators :
- to tell their own people how great their leader is,
- to make their people forget about real life problems : "panem et circenses" (and in dictatorships the "circenses" part is more important than the "panem" part)
- the dictator can boast over his ability to host world-sized events, even if his country is in reality isolated politically,
- to be able to re-distribute giganormous amounts of dirty money to cronies right and left through construction of overpriced stadions etc.
- staging a World Cup is costly for the country. But it also brings huge revenues, and in authoritarian countries with no control whatsoever, this money ends up in the leader's pocket and his mafia.
- through shiny stadiums, new infrastructure and the opportunity to present a staged image of the nation, the dictator has a chance to distract the world’s press, players and tourists from reality,
- a big event, the whole world as spectator, big stadions filled with crowds cheering for the local team : in authoritarian nations this can breed nationalism, a dangerous anti-democratic national pride that emphasises the superiority of the state above all, or even racism, in the worst cases.
The world being what it is, it may be worth asking ourselves how low moral standards we are ready to tolerate when we watch our favorite competition.