Tamaz >> sunnuntai marraskuu 24 - 09:38

I think we needed to increase tv revenues many seasons ago. The money is so thiny that nobody cares about it.

Maybe start to increase it again?

20-50m for oligarchs will be nothing. But for beginners ans small teams, a really big money.

Numpty >> sunnuntai marraskuu 24 - 12:19

I'm not clear what this would achieve.

Apparently Vincent's main objective for the new high level facilities was to take money out of the game and make it more difficult for the top clubs to manage their budget. So there's no point in giving them more TV revenue. 

If it's to help the smaller teams then it would be better to reduce the cost and building times of the non-academy buildings.  

Taavi >> sunnuntai marraskuu 24 - 17:02

The new facilities just meant rich clubs can get an advantage again from their saved up money

But , the system is good , there will be a cap on what teams can afford and smaller teams can catch up again... 

TV revenue cant be increased because teams will prefer to stay in lower leagues to earn more

Realistic system would be cool , earning more TV revenue in league 1 then in league 2 , but then there will be now new teams :D

Ar4ers >> sunnuntai marraskuu 24 - 17:56

In real football also has oligarchs, its normal I guess

To be fair , its normal that oldest clubs here has more money and better players, facilities

Maniaque >> maanantai marraskuu 25 - 05:22, Muokattu maanantai marraskuu 25 - 05:32

the big issue is 0 revenues if the team dont have points in the standings. its idiot because even when u lose there is still some revenues in real life. this is not a question of win or lose. with how the game is , big teams get bigger and small teams cant improve much.

onuelver >> keskiviikko marraskuu 27 - 16:58

Previous season Estonian D2 winner earned more tv revenue than 2nd team in D1...this is funny but extreme reality. It matters nothing this season when 3 matches to go and team is still waiting their first win. Previously they played 4 seasons in a row in D1 so it was not random promotion. So much about "huge" tv revenues and their influence.

And again: real life revenue is also mostly stadium income. With 35k stadium it's 35k x $40=1.4M per home match which will make more than those 15M won by Estonian D2 winner. Add here some money from fanshop and catering too. Real life clubs in smallest countries earn half of their budget from continental matches(2 or in good year 4) but here you win nothing from those and stadiums are quite empty on match of year.

Ronaldo César >> keskiviikko marraskuu 27 - 21:13

If it were added on a female server it would be cool. I said that so as not to harm the old users who spent years of their lives in this one.

Numpty >> keskiviikko marraskuu 27 - 21:33

So I googled female server and got some very attractive ladies ... :D

onuelver >> keskiviikko marraskuu 27 - 21:34

As i remember female leagues are rejected several times by developers. 

Ronaldo César >> keskiviikko marraskuu 27 - 22:12

This proposal seems strange, it is better to put it aside. This server is already in decay imagine thinking of another.:blush:

davo >> torstai marraskuu 28 - 07:51

female server...hahaha. Such a patronising idea to suggest that females cannot perform on an equal footing with males on a game such as RS and need a server of their own.

Peter >> torstai marraskuu 28 - 15:51

That idea does seem quite ridiculous, which is why I don't think that was the motivation behind the suggestion.