Forum: Anglais rss-feed

Ceci est le forum de discussion général en anglais. Lorsque vous écrivez sur ce forum, vous devez écrire dans cette langue. Les messages dans d'autres langues peuvent être effacés sans vous en informer. Le forum utilise des sous-sections pour vos messages avec différents sujets et objectifs. Merci de laisser vos messages concernant les problèmes dans la section problèmes et de prendre votre temps pour comprendre oú les autres messages doivent aller.

Anglais >> Suggestions

stadium upgrade ( vip seats, roof , led lights ) (22)


uy Awful >> lundi juillet 27 - 06:24

hi community,

i think, we all need new stadium upgrade . ( 2 more levels )   and current upgrade prices must be reduced by 4x  .. That will help new users to benifit, and old users, to build more . 

new 2 levels include -

1st - 50k extra seats, 1k Vip seats

2nd- roof, lightning ( reduces maintrance costs hugely, and rise ticket price )

what do you think guys ?

uy Awful
Confirmé
Enregistré2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
uy Awful >> lundi juillet 27 - 06:35

and few new buildings-

media/TV office ( boosts TV money , popularity )

security room - ( to keep everything safe and in control ((adds extra popularity and stadium attendance , especially VIP seats)) )

youth couching - ( very expensive building, where 3 players from y academy can gain extra talent - 0,15 talent points in season )

uy Awful
Confirmé
Enregistré2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
ro Andrei >> lundi juillet 27 - 07:15
I would suppose the VIP seats would receive different ticket prices, otherwise why have them. Not to mention extra cost to get them built.



All I see is quite a bit of cost reduction in the stadium suggestions ... What's wrong with current costs? I understand the costs are high, but that's the whole idea behind the game. Manage your income, manage your costs. Don't look for an easy way out.
ro Andrei
Novice
Enregistré2014-08-30
uy Awful >> lundi juillet 27 - 07:28


''All I see is quite a bit of cost reduction in the stadium suggestions ... What's wrong with current costs? I understand the costs are high, but that's the whole idea behind the game. Manage your income, manage your costs. Don't look for an easy way out.''

why not? im thinking smart. stadium need vip seats, led lights , mbe big TV screen , roof .

uy Awful
Confirmé
Enregistré2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
il Numpty >> lundi juillet 27 - 07:53, Modifié lundi juillet 27 - 08:05

I think it's fine to reduce construction costs to make it easier to play catch up.

But please no more stadium levels. The game needs less money at the top levels, not more. 

Edit

I do like the idea of a security room though. All fitted out with the latest technology and CCTV. You could use it to keep out all the unwanted visitors, such as those with forum bans ... ;)

il Numpty
Confirmé
Enregistré2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
nl Losing >> lundi juillet 27 - 13:35

We don't need to give top clubs even more income. That would mean FA6/YA6 could become feasible, and the new structure was made so you need to make choices. Extra income and reduced maintenance would annul that to just give the current top teams an extra advantage. They'd be the first to build it.

And you can't just declare that what you're saying is smart and have it be that way :P

nl Losing
Confirmé
Enregistré2017-05-06
il Numpty >> lundi juillet 27 - 13:44

* Takes notes *

Installs a smart-o-meter detector as a security system upgrade. 

il Numpty
Confirmé
Enregistré2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
nl Joddit >> lundi juillet 27 - 18:36

Am I the only one noticing that it would be a terrible idea to reduce maintenance after building a roof on your stadium?

If you want to see what could happen just Google AZ stadium roof collapse. 

nl Joddit
Confirmé
Enregistré2018-03-02
nl Domstad FC
il Numpty >> lundi juillet 27 - 18:56, Modifié lundi juillet 27 - 19:48

Yes, but the suggestion is that it comes with lightning!

↯ ⭍ ↯ ↯ ⭍

So you obviously get lots of free electricity.

il Numpty
Confirmé
Enregistré2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
ro Andrei >> lundi juillet 27 - 19:05
"I think it's fine to reduce construction costs to make it easier to play catch up."

Well ... yes, let's say it does help. But not reduce it by 75%, the way Awful suggests it. That's quite a bit too much.
ro Andrei
Novice
Enregistré2014-08-30
ru Ebitimi >> lundi juillet 27 - 19:56

Awful is being awfully 'smart' . Lol don't come after me I didn't do nothing. 

But I do think reducing the current stadium upgrade construction cost by say 30% isn't a bad idea.

I wonder why this suggestion thread in here in the first place when 99.999999% of what's being suggested hasn't been implemented.   Like I said don't come after me.

ru Ebitimi
Confirmé
Enregistré2018-10-09
bf FC Djibo
il Numpty >> lundi juillet 27 - 20:00, Modifié lundi juillet 27 - 20:01

I must have missed that bit @Andrei.

When you edit out all the extraneous material the suggestion becomes: 

  • "i ...  need new stadium upgrade ... current upgrade prices must be reduced by 4x  .. That will help ... old users, to build more . ... reduces maintrance costs hugely ... rise ticket price  ... boosts TV money , popularity  ...  adds extra popularity and stadium attendance"

Does anyone smell a rat?

il Numpty
Confirmé
Enregistré2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
uy Awful >> mardi juillet 28 - 01:58

not only me, everyone will be happy!

maxed stadiums- chance to build extra vip seats , install big tv screen (more money from tickets )

lower stadium- easier to catch up ..

you should support me on this one , Numpty !

uy Awful
Confirmé
Enregistré2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
ro Andrei >> mardi juillet 28 - 03:49
Not by reducing the construction costs by that much.
ro Andrei
Novice
Enregistré2014-08-30
uy Awful >> mardi juillet 28 - 05:37

Andrei

Can you please inform Vincent about my ideas ?  

uy Awful
Confirmé
Enregistré2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC