Forum: Inglese rss-feed

Questo è il forum di discussione generale in inglese. Quando scrivi in questo forum devi usare questa lingua. Interventi in lingue diverse possono essere cancellati senza preavviso. Questo forum usa sottosezioni per interventi con scopi diversi. Ti preghiamo di segnalare i bugs nella sezione apposita e di prenderti un po’ di tempo per capire dove inserire i tuoi interventi.

Inglese >> Proposte

stadium upgrade ( vip seats, roof , led lights ) (22)


uy Awful >> lunedì luglio 27 - 06:24

hi community,

i think, we all need new stadium upgrade . ( 2 more levels )   and current upgrade prices must be reduced by 4x  .. That will help new users to benifit, and old users, to build more . 

new 2 levels include -

1st - 50k extra seats, 1k Vip seats

2nd- roof, lightning ( reduces maintrance costs hugely, and rise ticket price )

what do you think guys ?

uy Awful
Intermedio
Registrato2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
uy Awful >> lunedì luglio 27 - 06:35

and few new buildings-

media/TV office ( boosts TV money , popularity )

security room - ( to keep everything safe and in control ((adds extra popularity and stadium attendance , especially VIP seats)) )

youth couching - ( very expensive building, where 3 players from y academy can gain extra talent - 0,15 talent points in season )

uy Awful
Intermedio
Registrato2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
ro Andrei >> lunedì luglio 27 - 07:15
I would suppose the VIP seats would receive different ticket prices, otherwise why have them. Not to mention extra cost to get them built.



All I see is quite a bit of cost reduction in the stadium suggestions ... What's wrong with current costs? I understand the costs are high, but that's the whole idea behind the game. Manage your income, manage your costs. Don't look for an easy way out.
ro Andrei
Principiante
Registrato2014-08-30
uy Awful >> lunedì luglio 27 - 07:28


''All I see is quite a bit of cost reduction in the stadium suggestions ... What's wrong with current costs? I understand the costs are high, but that's the whole idea behind the game. Manage your income, manage your costs. Don't look for an easy way out.''

why not? im thinking smart. stadium need vip seats, led lights , mbe big TV screen , roof .

uy Awful
Intermedio
Registrato2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
il Numpty >> lunedì luglio 27 - 07:53, Modificato lunedì luglio 27 - 08:05

I think it's fine to reduce construction costs to make it easier to play catch up.

But please no more stadium levels. The game needs less money at the top levels, not more. 

Edit

I do like the idea of a security room though. All fitted out with the latest technology and CCTV. You could use it to keep out all the unwanted visitors, such as those with forum bans ... ;)

il Numpty
Intermedio
Registrato2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
nl Losing >> lunedì luglio 27 - 13:35

We don't need to give top clubs even more income. That would mean FA6/YA6 could become feasible, and the new structure was made so you need to make choices. Extra income and reduced maintenance would annul that to just give the current top teams an extra advantage. They'd be the first to build it.

And you can't just declare that what you're saying is smart and have it be that way :P

nl Losing
Intermedio
Registrato2017-05-06
il Numpty >> lunedì luglio 27 - 13:44

* Takes notes *

Installs a smart-o-meter detector as a security system upgrade. 

il Numpty
Intermedio
Registrato2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
nl Joddit >> lunedì luglio 27 - 18:36

Am I the only one noticing that it would be a terrible idea to reduce maintenance after building a roof on your stadium?

If you want to see what could happen just Google AZ stadium roof collapse. 

nl Joddit
Intermedio
Registrato2018-03-02
nl Domstad FC
il Numpty >> lunedì luglio 27 - 18:56, Modificato lunedì luglio 27 - 19:48

Yes, but the suggestion is that it comes with lightning!

↯ ⭍ ↯ ↯ ⭍

So you obviously get lots of free electricity.

il Numpty
Intermedio
Registrato2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
ro Andrei >> lunedì luglio 27 - 19:05
"I think it's fine to reduce construction costs to make it easier to play catch up."

Well ... yes, let's say it does help. But not reduce it by 75%, the way Awful suggests it. That's quite a bit too much.
ro Andrei
Principiante
Registrato2014-08-30
ru Ebitimi >> lunedì luglio 27 - 19:56

Awful is being awfully 'smart' . Lol don't come after me I didn't do nothing. 

But I do think reducing the current stadium upgrade construction cost by say 30% isn't a bad idea.

I wonder why this suggestion thread in here in the first place when 99.999999% of what's being suggested hasn't been implemented.   Like I said don't come after me.

ru Ebitimi
Intermedio
Registrato2018-10-09
bf FC Djibo
il Numpty >> lunedì luglio 27 - 20:00, Modificato lunedì luglio 27 - 20:01

I must have missed that bit @Andrei.

When you edit out all the extraneous material the suggestion becomes: 

  • "i ...  need new stadium upgrade ... current upgrade prices must be reduced by 4x  .. That will help ... old users, to build more . ... reduces maintrance costs hugely ... rise ticket price  ... boosts TV money , popularity  ...  adds extra popularity and stadium attendance"

Does anyone smell a rat?

il Numpty
Intermedio
Registrato2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
uy Awful >> martedì luglio 28 - 01:58

not only me, everyone will be happy!

maxed stadiums- chance to build extra vip seats , install big tv screen (more money from tickets )

lower stadium- easier to catch up ..

you should support me on this one , Numpty !

uy Awful
Intermedio
Registrato2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC
ro Andrei >> martedì luglio 28 - 03:49
Not by reducing the construction costs by that much.
ro Andrei
Principiante
Registrato2014-08-30
uy Awful >> martedì luglio 28 - 05:37

Andrei

Can you please inform Vincent about my ideas ?  

uy Awful
Intermedio
Registrato2015-05-10
hr Internacionālā Daugava FC