viktor >>
trečiadienis gegužė 19 - 01:09, Pataisyta
trečiadienis gegužė 19 - 23:54 @,keju Imho one of the three best teams by personnel will get elimiinated. That is supposed to be the charm of the cup - an unfancied team could make a deep run.
@Bartje thanks. Back in those days , you did not have the rule, "the match engine will allow you to select Maximum of four players - the remaining seven are fixed" also marketed by Vincent and advocates like Strood (a great manager) as the "fairness rule". So fatigue management was key and it helped win a few international matches against better teams when you could target their tired players. With the introduction of the fairness rule the rotation was reduced to 12-14 players. every key player on your team was fatigued for the second match even if you could have won the first one with a different lineup. I could not find a way to enter the second match within 2 hours with players who were not faitgied and most teams in Champions League had 3-4 players made using credits which meant you stood no chance if you did not do the same. And I was out of ideas on how to manage the India NT better( Just using credits to create 11 players would've meant you were no longer managing a team, you were just putting better players out there and hoping)
Maybe the higher health center level (and Endurance levels ?) have solved that problem of having a player ready for Champions League away match a couple of hours after an away league match.
And that's why I think FC ulhasnagar is managed better than Bombay FC