Forum: Engleză rss-feed

Aceasta este secţiunea de forum general pentru limba engleză. Când postezi pe acest forum trebuie să o faci în această limbă. Orice postare în altă limbă va fi înlăturată fără notificare. Forumul e împărţit în mai multe secţiuni pentru postări cu subiecte şi scopuri diferite. Te rugăm să raportezi erorile în secţiunea de erori iar pentru celelalte tipuri de postări să încerci să-ţi dai seama unde s-ar potrivi.

Engleză >> Întrebări

Calculating times trained using the actual skill (15)

Jim >> marţi iulie 2 - 06:04
I was trying to determine which player to buy based on how many times a player was trained on an skill before bidding (For example between a keeper with 6 of blocking and 3 tactics and one with 5.8 on blocking, 2 on tactics and 2 on passing) to determine if it's worth spend credits or not, so i went to check the help files because something seemed odd.

https://rockingsoccer.com/en/soccer/help/home/category-2/article-44

The example works fine when the age factor is 100%, but it seems to fail sometimes

For example:

My keeper have 145 times trained on blocking with an age factor of 76, so he should have a blocking skill of 5.51, instead his skill is 6.78, more than 1 ball more.
My midfield have 115 times trained on passing with an age factor of 98, so he should have a passing skill of 5.63, instead his skill is 5.65, almost the same but still not identical, and that is with an almost 100 age factor, with an older midfield the difference could be higher.
Meanwhile my forward have 152 times trained on scoring with an age factor of 77, so he should have a scoring skill of 5.81, which he does.
(I don't old players with high dueling, my defenders are young)

Anyone knows why sometimes the value is different to the one it should be or what I'm doing wrong?
Jim
Utilizator
Înregistrat2017-10-22
ec TheBeastEvolved
nl Koen >> marţi iulie 2 - 07:22

Everything you do is fine, it's just a few minor things that put you on the wrong foot: First of all, the agingfactor is given in full percentages, but those are actually rounded numbers. The midfielder in you example who has an age factor of 98 in reality has an age factor of somewhere between 97.5 and 98.5. Within that interval there is a number that would give you the exact passing skill.

Second: The blocking skill is not depending on the age factor in the same way as the other skills, not even close. It's a way to let keepers reach their peak later in the game. I don't have the aging formula for blocking, I guess it is a function containing a squareroot.. Maybe someone else knows this?

nl Koen
Nou venit
Înregistrat2013-03-21
il Numpty >> marţi iulie 2 - 10:19, Editat marţi iulie 2 - 10:56

Just to add to Koen's excellent answer. 

For blocking the 4th root of the age factor is applied. This is what makes the keepers last so much longer. (On a basic calculator this can easily be done by using the square root function twice.)  

So for the keeper the formula is:

Blocking value = times trained/20 * (age factor)**1/4

With your keeper this becomes 145/20 * (0.76)**1/4 = 6.78

(Bearing in mind that the aging factor will not be exactly 0.76).

The midfielder is currently aged 22 year, 20 weeks. This will give him an age factor of approximately 98.25%.

Therefore his Passing skill will be 115/20 * 0.9825 = 5.65

https://rockingsoccer.com/en/soccer/info/player-1735909

Summary of skills vs age factor

Blocking - apply the 4th root of the age factor

Duelling, Passing and Scoring -  apply the age factor

Tactics - no age factor

Similarly, the fixed attributes are:

Power, Speed - apply the age factor

Endurance - apply the age factor, squared

il Numpty
Utilizator
Înregistrat2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
nl Koen >> marţi iulie 2 - 13:36

Now THAT is the excellent answer ;-)

nl Koen
Nou venit
Înregistrat2013-03-21
Jim >> miercuri iulie 3 - 04:12
Thanks that was pretty useful
Jim
Utilizator
Înregistrat2017-10-22
ec TheBeastEvolved
ee Taavi >> miercuri iulie 3 - 07:57

Neeeeerds

just kidding, thumbs up to everyone, amazing

ee Taavi
Admin comunitate
Înregistrat2014-01-17
ee FC Pusa
il Numpty >> miercuri iulie 3 - 08:05

Mea culpa, Taavi. :D

il Numpty
Utilizator
Înregistrat2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
ee Taavi >> miercuri iulie 3 - 08:30

non forsit , numpty

Think i should tattoo that somewhere, i already have memento vivere on my ribs

ee Taavi
Admin comunitate
Înregistrat2014-01-17
ee FC Pusa
yeah amazing to learn from this.
eng ipfreely >> miercuri iulie 3 - 22:27

No wonder my formula was wrong, I went linear instead of exponential :-/ Thanks Numpty.

eng ipfreely
Utilizator
Înregistrat2013-12-08
vi Lollapa Losers
ee Taavi >> joi iulie 4 - 04:23

Numpty got more thumbs up then me in my 6 years here

ee Taavi
Admin comunitate
Înregistrat2014-01-17
ee FC Pusa
us Oregonian >> vineri septembrie 13 - 02:51, Editat vineri septembrie 13 - 02:54

How is the age factor defined relative to the age? Are there any tables/studies/formula available?

PS new manager, just started to look around.

UPDATE: found the table.

us Oregonian
Utilizator
Înregistrat2019-09-10
hr Kupus >> vineri septembrie 13 - 06:37

The mans patience is simply amazing.

hr Kupus
Admin comunitate
Înregistrat2015-10-14
de Regnum Croatorum
tr Mustafa >> luni octombrie 21 - 05:44

@Numpty

Thank you for this information :)

tr Mustafa
Utilizator
Înregistrat2014-03-22
tr FC Kadıoğlu Gençlik ⭐
ar fom78 >> duminică noiembrie 24 - 05:55

Excelent very good information! Thanks

ar fom78
Utilizator
Înregistrat2014-05-23
ar SuperXeneiXeS