Eric_Cantonais >> 週二 十二月 10 - 12:34

@ Garfman this is a very bad idea, as it would make it even easier for cheaters to fraudulously transfer players. No offense but i am stunned that as an admin you can suggest such a terrible idea.

Look at the transfer market, there are tons of 200M players which cannot find a buyer for 50. With your suggestion, some ill-minded people could use an alt-account to buy their own players for 100 or 150, and the admins would not have anything to say about it.

Numpty >> 週二 十二月 10 - 12:49, 新編輯 週二 十二月 10 - 12:51

@Eric 

I agree, but maybe @Garfman hasn't given all the details of what they have in mind.   

Automatically allowing bids under market value would be fine provided this was under the max bank value or some other similar restriction.

It would also be an improvement if admins had to approve any bot bids above the max bank value as well.  

Garfman >> 週二 十二月 10 - 14:27

@Eric_Cantonais Was I referring to 200M players? I did not specify said amount. I should have been more clear, yes, but perhaps you could have shown a bit more respect and ask for clarification first.

I'm talking about, as Numpty already aluded to, the lower end of the bidding spectrum. The vast majority of the bids fall in that category (around the max bank value or below), so it would make the work load a lot lighter if those could be approved automatically.

Garfman >> 週二 十二月 10 - 14:36, 新編輯 週二 十二月 10 - 14:36

Because, adding to that, it would actually give us the time to more closely scrutinize exactly the transfers that Eric is alluding to. 

Lee >> 週三 十二月 30 - 01:48

If there are too many transfers to review, could the price limit not simply be increased?

I'm currently waiting for transfers of 2 sold players to be reviewed but the selling prices are less than 20M RSD, which seems way too low. My recommendation is to increase the review limit to 50M RSD.