Foro: Inglés rss-feed

Este es el foro de debate general en inglés. Cuando escribas una entrada en este foro, debes utilizar este idioma. Las entradas en otros idiomas pueden ser eliminadas sin aviso previo. Este foro se divide en subsecciones para entradas con temas y objetivos distintos. Por favor, escribe sobre los fallos (bugs) del juego en la sección de fallos; antes de escribir una entrada, medita en que subsección dónde debería estar tu entrada.

Inglés >> Preguntas

Awaiting fo review (20)


ru Eric_Cantonais >> martes diciembre 10 - 12:34

@ Garfman this is a very bad idea, as it would make it even easier for cheaters to fraudulously transfer players. No offense but i am stunned that as an admin you can suggest such a terrible idea.

Look at the transfer market, there are tons of 200M players which cannot find a buyer for 50. With your suggestion, some ill-minded people could use an alt-account to buy their own players for 100 or 150, and the admins would not have anything to say about it.

ru Eric_Cantonais
Usuario
Registrado2013-08-11
fr Le Feu Occulte
il Numpty >> martes diciembre 10 - 12:49, Editado martes diciembre 10 - 12:51

@Eric 

I agree, but maybe @Garfman hasn't given all the details of what they have in mind.   

Automatically allowing bids under market value would be fine provided this was under the max bank value or some other similar restriction.

It would also be an improvement if admins had to approve any bot bids above the max bank value as well.  

il Numpty
Usuario
Registrado2018-10-19
eng Heath Hornets
ua Garfman >> martes diciembre 10 - 14:27

@Eric_Cantonais Was I referring to 200M players? I did not specify said amount. I should have been more clear, yes, but perhaps you could have shown a bit more respect and ask for clarification first.

I'm talking about, as Numpty already aluded to, the lower end of the bidding spectrum. The vast majority of the bids fall in that category (around the max bank value or below), so it would make the work load a lot lighter if those could be approved automatically.

ua Garfman
Administrador jefe de la comunidad
Registrado2013-02-08
ph Garfman FC
ua Garfman >> martes diciembre 10 - 14:36, Editado martes diciembre 10 - 14:36

Because, adding to that, it would actually give us the time to more closely scrutinize exactly the transfers that Eric is alluding to. 

ua Garfman
Administrador jefe de la comunidad
Registrado2013-02-08
ph Garfman FC
eng Lee >> miércoles diciembre 30 - 01:48

If there are too many transfers to review, could the price limit not simply be increased?

I'm currently waiting for transfers of 2 sold players to be reviewed but the selling prices are less than 20M RSD, which seems way too low. My recommendation is to increase the review limit to 50M RSD.

eng Lee
Usuario
Registrado2014-10-14
eng Canvey Pixels