MAKAROS >> lunes enero 27 - 08:49

I would like to suggest something about the sponsors

so there are not many team options to choose from a sponsor I think there could be a list of sponsors depending on the league category with different offers and better finances for the benefit of all teams

Also, there was the potential for targets for each team to go up, so at the end of the year there would be more revenue

 and something else

to have a bank used by the teams to lend money to serve their purposes and there is a greater need now with the construction of newer buildings I think would be very useful

of course there will be a ceiling for a fair play!

Numpty >> lunes enero 27 - 14:58, Editado lunes enero 27 - 15:04

Let's just cut to the chase shall we.

If we remove all the verbosity, the suggestion is for: 

• "better finances"
• "more revenue"
• "to lend money"

So essentially you seem to want an increase of money in the game. Either through more sponsorship or borrowing or both. 

Vincent apparently wants the oppposite which is allegedly why he brought in the new buildings.

So whether we agree or not is largely irrelevant - it's not going to happen.

The game is the same for everyone, so the wise thing would be find ways to increase your own income and reduce your expenses. Or as @Andrei puts it: just manage your money better.

MAKAROS >> lunes enero 27 - 20:44

if you have money yes you can manage it but if you don't then you can do it specially as a new small club you will long to do it specially now with the most demanding requirements in building buildings.

The point I believe here is not just to write proposals as reports but to ask these players what it is like gallop to see and what we want as a whole and not always answering here 2-3 managers because it has no value I believe.

MAKAROS >> martes enero 28 - 06:33

Αnd so I started like so many others in here but we need to cut in before we move forward Andrei?

make a gallop on financial matters to see what most want

Would you like?

Joost >> martes enero 28 - 08:16, Editado martes enero 28 - 08:18

For what you need a loan, for both my teams building time made the process slow down. Money never did, just now money for the first time was a factor in building TA2. And that was the case because I don't want to go under 1 billion in my bank account.

Garfman >> martes enero 28 - 14:41

I don't agree with this suggestion. With proper financial management, neither loans nor extra options for sponsors are needed. There are plenty of possibilities to earn money. 

Don-x⭐Ⓜ dedicating s75 league&cup titles to hi >> martes enero 28 - 18:11

Play the old way for a while, then you will have surplus of money, 

There's someone I know still doing it stadium less than level 8, should have 10bilion now, 

MAKAROS >> miércoles enero 29 - 13:01

Whether we like it or not, the game has changed with so many new buildings being built and new players being introduced.

this is the same as any other now that you are saving more money than you used to.

I go into that, and I propose to make a floating medium to meet these new needs.

and I disagree with the essence of the forum we just write to write and we don't change the essence!

onuelver >> sábado febrero 1 - 22:30

Once we had situation when every stronger team has max facilities and money but nothing to do with that as everyone had similar players. That's why academies were introduced. Goal was to generate different ways and more diversity between clubs. Giving more money will just turn back times and ensure eternal domination of current leaders. Now is chance that some top teams have been too rapacious and will suffer after that giving hope to other teams pass them.

pettore >> lunes febrero 3 - 10:07

I think that the sponsorship idea can be taken into account to make the game slightly more enternaining. I explain myself.

Instead of getting one sponsorship offer you get two or three and you are allowed to choose one of them. The setup could be something like this:

- One offer where all money are guaranteed (the one that we get now)

- One offer where a part of the money are guaranteed (say equal to 75% of the first offer) and a final bonus if certain objectives are reached (say equal to 30% of the first offer)

- One offer without guaranteed money (or very little, say 20% of the first offer), but at the end of the year there is a bonus if a certain criteria is met (say up to 110% of the first offer).

I believe that this setup will not generate a consistent amount of additional income (could actually potentially reduce the amount of money in the game), but add some fun (a decision to make) to the game.

To make everything more interesting it would be great to tie the bonuses not to points made, but to other metrics such as: goals made, goals conceded or clean sheets

Off em definitivo >> martes febrero 4 - 11:15

I think it is inconsistent to make so much money in the stadium, a crude idea to re-enact the main revenue of the club. Removing this model I agree with this proposal. I don't accept any more money without reducing the money coming from the stadium.