Forum: English 
This is the general discussion forum for English. When you post in this forum you have to use this language. Posts in other languages may be removed without notice. This forum uses subsections for posts with different topics or purposes. Please posts bugs in the bugs section and take some time to figure out where other posts should go.
English >> General discussion
Not Frustrated at all topic. Season 9-99 (9171)
@Don you'll have to improve on that, I've never struggled financially since I started the game, one of the reason why I always make the stadium a priority
@Don, if your SPENDING almost 100m on JUST loaning 3 players for 1 season. Than something is not right, thats for sure
He's certainly shelled out for those eggs. The cakes will have to be eggspensive.
That was a terrible yolk.
First Leeds come from behind to hammer Newcastle, then my team comes from behind to beat my strongest opposition.
i have seen a single loan deals worth 78m, 62m.
Are you trying to get at me or the game that has a high wage structure.
Some seasons ago i realised that one reason why my second team can't progress was wasting lot of money for loaning high waged youngsters. For same or less money i can buy couple of oldies to help me through CL Q1. Meanwhile i need them really only for those 2 or 4 euro matches because in Albanian league i could sell my 11 best players and still probably win all trophies but will be humiliated in Q1 by any team.
To be fair, @Don-x's $110m is only double the wages of these players and, as a one-off payment it could be argued that it is a finacially astute way of getting good quality players. Drafting in 3 players of this quality who are at the end of their careers would have been impossible for $110. Arguably you could have done it for double that and they might have given you a couple of seasons (and might have ultimately made good staff), but it amounts to the same per season in the end.
getting a qulity defender on loan for three season as i do wont surpass the the 70m you spent. @davo has a reasonable point.
Interesting discussion gents. I think it largely depends on the quality of the players involved.
At some levels it's more cost-effective to borrow players and at other levels it's better to buy your own. Getting those kind of decisions right can be a big factor in how well you do financially.
@onulever Finally people are catching onto the trend.
The prime scenario is if you're a club that's chasing short term success in a competitive league to fill up the CV before relocating to a more standardized one say England or China:it makes absoluely no sense to chase youngsters when the market is galore with better players who stay for longer and cost lesser overall.(Of course this applies for >15 "stars")
There also needs to be a realistic assessment of where your club sits in the hierarchy.
If you're not a top club or a near challenger then you won't get there by spending money on slightly better players. Any major improvement has to come from steadily making more money rather than chasing short-term success. A mid-table club who is struggling financially won't go any higher without a change in strategy.
If you want to catch up quickly in this game the only way to do it is to largely forget about the team and concentrate entirely on the finances. I use the word 'quickly' in a very loose manner, of course. Nothing is quick. :)