EroSt >>
friday may 17 - 10:03, Edited
friday may 17 - 10:04 I also have one more suggestion.
It would be good idea that managers, who made some player available for a loan have some effect in deciding his new loan club. Why? Because if you loan some player it's obvious that you want for that player to play matches and because of that you can arrange some club in which he'll play.
Why am I posting this? Because yesterday one manager ask me am I willing to let one of my young player to go on a loan in his club. He would be in his first squad and play regularly. I thought about this and concluded that it is ideal for him. Why? He would play league matches and get more experience in that club than in my where he would play in U21. So I decided to let him go. After I put him on a loan list, another manager offer him a deal and he decided to go on a loan in that club. I asked that manager will he let him play and he said probably not, but he will play in U21. That made me so angry, because I made a deal and find him club in which he'll get more experience and than he decided to go on a loan in different club where he won't get much experience.
In reality, every manager have impact when he loan one of his players. He knows what's good for him and his future and help him to be better player. He'll find him a club in which he'll play, not in which he'll be on a bench or worse. It would be nice if we have that here. I'm not suggesting that you should decided where will player go if he is on transfer list. Just on a loan list, or have huge impact in his decision. Because everything he do for that player, is in his interest, and he don't want to see him on a bench in different club.
Another idea, if you can do this, is to allow us some options when loaning players. Like contract in which will be. If PLAYER A, while he is on a loan, don't play at least OPTION=(10/15/20/25/30) game for that club overall in seniors, that manager will have to pay expenses for braking contract in the amount of (eg. tripple of his value).